INDEPENDENT CLINICAL EVALUATION
Services
Commission a defined assessment of clinical AI behavior, a reproducibility study, a benchmark, or an educational simulation.
Start with the decision the system is expected to support.
Scope is set around the intended user, clinical task, deployment setting, model version, and the consequences of an incorrect response. Deliverables, access, confidentiality, and timelines are agreed before work begins.
Clinical AI safety evaluation
For developers, health-tech teams, and organizations that need a physician-led assessment of system outputs and their clinical implications.
Potential deliverables
- A scoped test matrix and documented evaluation conditions
- Clinically annotated findings, explicit outcome definitions, and an evidence appendix
- A concise decision brief with prioritized observations
Medical AI red teaming
For teams investigating unsafe compliance, harmful refusal, role-conditioned behavior, or context-sensitive safeguards.
Potential deliverables
- Matched scenario and user-role conditions
- Repeat testing and a record of model/version and run conditions
- Failure characterization with public and restricted reporting separated when appropriate
Failure reproduction and characterization
For an observed safety issue that needs a documented test of recurrence and boundary conditions.
Potential deliverables
- A reproduction plan and controlled variations
- Counts with explicit analytic units and denominators
- Annotated examples and mitigation-oriented observations
Clinical benchmark and scenario development
For evaluations that need to measure clinically meaningful behavior beyond question-answer accuracy.
Potential deliverables
- Physician-authored scenario families and condition matrices
- A scoring rubric, outcome definitions, and reporting structure
- A scoped pilot and revision record when included in the engagement
Independent clinical review
For review of model outputs, benchmark items, user-facing instructions, or clinical product claims.
Potential deliverables
- An annotated review of the supplied materials
- Clinical relevance and safety concerns distinguished from wording issues
- A written scope and record of reviewed versions
Custom simulations and educational modules
For educational publishers, medical affairs teams, and institutions exploring interactive case challenges or advanced-therapy education.
Potential deliverables
- A defined audience, learning objective, and content scope
- An agreed Crucible, CASCADE, or custom prototype configuration
- A deployment, measurement, and licensing plan appropriate to the project
How an engagement is scoped
| Step | What is agreed |
|---|---|
| 01 · Question | The system, intended use, target behavior, and decision the evaluation should inform. |
| 02 · Design | Materials, conditions, outcome definitions, exclusions, and deliverables. |
| 03 · Evaluation | Versioned testing or review with evidence sufficient to support the reported findings. |
| 04 · Handoff | A scoped report, limitations, and any separately commissioned follow-up. |
Pricing is quoted for the agreed scope. An inquiry does not create a contract, assurance of safety, regulatory certification, or clinical validation.
Describe the system and the question.
A short, non-confidential project summary is enough to begin.
Professional research and education. This site does not provide patient-specific medical care. Scope & disclaimer